|Vigil at University of Michigan.|
"But this [narrative of clash of civilizations] is a false dichotomy. It omits a far more uncomfortable and complicated truth about racial tension in France, immigration, and how Muslims are settling in an increasingly secular Europe where the resurgence of rightwing parties has further racialised religion...[The perpetrators] belong to no single community or country or mosque. There is no viper’s nest that can be burned down, and with it the problem. That way lies the mistakes of Iraq and Afghanistan, where non-state actors such as al-Qaida were conflated with states and regimes, resulting in the killing of millions of innocents, and further fuelling a race to the bottom of hate." - Nesrine Malik
Edward Said criticizes Orientalism while I think of the deracialization of a satirical magazine's work: "The Orient and Islam have a kind of extrareal, phenomenologically reduced status that puts them out of reach of everyone except the Western expert. From the beginning of Western speculation about the Orient, the one thing the orient could not do was to represent itself. Evidence of the Orient was credible only after it had passed through and been made firm by the refining fire of the Orientalist’s work."
"No one today is purely one thing. Labels like Indian, or woman, or Muslim, or American are not more than starting-points, which if followed into actual experience for only a moment are quickly left behind. Imperialism consolidated the mixture of cultures and identities on a global scale. But its worst and most paradoxical gift was to allow people to believe that they were only, mainly, exclusively, white, or Black, or Western, or Oriental. Yet just as human beings make their own history, they also make their cultures and ethnic identities. No one can deny the persisting continuities of long traditions, sustained habitations, national languages, and cultural geographies, but there seems no reason except fear and prejudice to keep insisting on their separation and distinctiveness, as if that was all human life was about. Survival in fact is about the connections between things; in Eliot’s phrase, reality cannot be deprived of the 'other echoes [that] inhabit the garden.' It is more rewarding - and more difficult - to think concretely and sympathetically, contrapuntally, about others than only about 'us.' But this also means not trying to rule others, not trying to classify them or put them in hierarchies, above all, not constantly reiterating how 'our' culture or country is number one (or not number one, for that matter)." - Edward Said
An apparently liberal atheist man killed three muslim college students in North Carolina. In a status update he posted on FB before the shooting he quoted Richard Dawkins at length. The quote articulates liberal discourse on individual rights and rational thought in opposition to some "irrational" other. There are no trending hashtags for #jesuismusulman among my FB friends, no reproducible cartoons criticizing liberal discourse as barbaric, and no eulogies for liberal rights like freedom of expression. For liberal necropolitics some lives definitely matter more than others. I am reminded of Frantz Fanon: 'In the colonial context the settler only ends his work of breaking in the native when the latter admits loudly and intelligibly the supremacy of the white man's values.' #muslimlivesmatter #blacklivesmatter
I understand the sentiment behind resisting the move to co-opt yet I can see how #muslimlivesmatter does not disallow, displace, or depoliticize #blacklivesmatter but, different from #alllivesmatter, it redeploys its politics through the logics of the digital meme. Its radical underpinning of "WE" matter too is rearticulated to flow on similar networks in the pursuit of achieving visibility. To announce that #muslimlivesmatter is to open the conversation about empire's operations across the imagined boundary of the 'domestic' and the 'foreign.' This hashtag signals an exploit within an information network's structure to turn, even if briefly, the logics of empire against itself. Similarly, its vitality affords users the possibility to talk across and, more importantly, beyond networks, thus producing the potential for solidarity between movements, "to resist, threaten, and ultimately desert," as Alex Galloway and Eugene Thacker suggest, "the dominant political diagram."